Helping users navigate the U.S. Department of Labor website.

Timeline
2 weeks
My role
UX/UI Designer

OVERVIEW

The U.S. Department of Labor website lacks clear design standards.

  • The interface is cumbersome, making it difficult to navigate the site.
  • There are problems with the site's accessibility.

I set out to improve navigation and accessibility.

My goals:
  • I wanted to reorganize the navigation so that more important topics were easier to find.
  • The content needed restructuring to make it more accessible.

RESEARCH

Why do people visit dol.gov?

  • A user would visit the U.S. Department of Labor's website to find information about workplace opportunities, job-related benefits and workers' rights issues.

Who would be the most likely visitor?

Kelsey Palmer

  • Age 25.
  • Lives in Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Graphic designer who was recently laid off from her job.
  • Looking for programs that can help find new opportunities within the design field.

USER INTERFACE ANALYSIS

A deeper look into the website’s layout.

I studied the website's structure to identify its main sections.
1
Logo
5
Content grouping
2
Search bar
6
Internal links
3
Navigation menu
7
Social feed
4
Header image

Evaluation, rating, and comparison of heuristic examples.

  • I uncovered some insights that will help me focus on specific areas while I'm developing my redesign.

TESTING

Testing the website against real users.

I conducted two in-person interviews to discover:
  • How do users respond to the current navigation system?
  • What weaknesses does the existing design have?
“The rest of the page could be more useful. There is too much stuff within these menus.”
—Chris

User tests key takeaways.

  • The navigation bar was so full of links that users felt overwhelmed.
  • Users had trouble knowing where they were on the site and which pages to visit next.

Visualizing feedback by impact and effort.

After conducting user tests, I assessed the impact and effort of each issue. Based on my analysis—I chose to focus on the following points:
  • Navigation.
  • Accessibility.
  • Consistency.

Evaluation of navigation.

Looking at navigation menus more closely revealed:
  • Reading all the topics in the drop-down menu takes a long time.
  • It is easy to lose your place within the links.
  • Some important topics are not accessible from the drop-down menu.

Card sorting navigation links.

After applying the card sorting method to group all of the navigation links into topics, I noticed that new data patterns had emerged.

New navigation system.

I made a couple of changes to the way navigation links should be ordered:
  • New sorting gives the user a more intuitive choice of categories, eliminates duplicate listings, and combines existing topics.
  • New sub-category topics are sorted in alphabetical order by default.

PROTOTYPING

New site map.

  • I built a visual representation of the website by utilizing a site map.
  • It helped me envision the structure and placement of content before I began my design process.

Low-fidelity prototype.

  • In my first iteration of the design utilizing new informational architecture, I focused on creating navigation menus.

TESTING

I wanted to see how users would respond to my new design.

  • I interviewed two people to test my initial redesign.

“The information was difficult to find. I had no sense where I was.”

—Troy

    User feedback key takeaways.

    I didn't quite hit the mark with improving the navigation. A number of issues still persisted:
    • The navigation needed to be more prominent.
    • Improvements were needed to make the website more accessible.
    • There were too many links on the page. They needed to be reduced and simplified.

    How I implemented feedback into my design.

    • The navigation became the central feature of the landing page.
    • I stripped away anything that might inhibit a user's search for information.

    A&B testing.

    I conducted several A/B tests with my friends and family to determine ways of addressing some problems:
    • The background is plain and empty. Would it benefit from having some color?
    • The intro paragraph of the page is often harder to distinguish from the rest of the copy. Could the size be improved?

    FINAL DESIGN

    New brand style guide.

    • The UI style for dol.gov is minimalist, deliberate, and easy to follow. Prioritizing big font sizes and high contrast for easy readability and high accesibility.

    High-fidelity design.

    Here is the first glimpse of the high-fidelity prototype of the updated of dol.gov website.
    • The Unemployment Insurance and Termination pages have been redesigned.
    • The text has been enlarged, making it easier to read.
    • The interface is simple and intuitive.

    FINAL RESULT

    High-fidelity prototype.

    Desktop PrototypeMobile Prototype

    CONCLUSION

    Testing and revisions led me to a better final product.

    • My first design was not as effective as I had hoped.
    • Talking with users and colleagues helped me reshape my idea for the landing page’s navigation menu.
    • After my second redesign was complete, users responded enthusiastically to its ease of use.
    • I want to return to working on this project and implement a hovering function that will provide visual clues about the destination of each link.